home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Columbia Kermit / kermit.zip / newsgroups / misc.20030409-20031118 / 000044_dbecker@cpicorp.com_Fri May 2 09:21:45 EDT 2003.msg < prev    next >
Text File  |  2020-01-01  |  3KB  |  64 lines

  1. Article: 14260 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
  2. Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!hammer.uoregon.edu!news.cc.ukans.edu!stl-feed.news.verio.net!news.cpicorp.com!not-for-mail
  3. From: Derek Chen-Becker <dbecker@cpicorp.com>
  4. Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
  5. Subject: Re: Changed behavior of receive/transmit move-to
  6. Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 08:01:11 -0500
  7. Organization: CPI Corporation
  8. Lines: 39
  9. Message-ID: <b8tq4l$kq4$1@cpimail.cpicorp.com>
  10. References: <b8rfll$kfv$1@cpimail.cpicorp.com> <b8rkdi$mo0$1@watsol.cc.columbia.edu> <3EB182CB.8000502@nyc.rr.com> <b8s3qt$bkm$1@watsol.cc.columbia.edu> <7Sgsa.48386$J17.32926@twister.nyc.rr.com>
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: dbecker-ld.cpicorp.com
  12. Mime-Version: 1.0
  13. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
  14. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  15. X-Trace: cpimail.cpicorp.com 1051880405 21316 131.100.250.5 (2 May 2003 13:00:05 GMT)
  16. X-Complaints-To: abuse@cpicorp.com
  17. NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:00:05 +0000 (UTC)
  18. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225
  19. X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
  20. In-Reply-To: <7Sgsa.48386$J17.32926@twister.nyc.rr.com>
  21. X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0
  22. X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
  23. Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:14260
  24.  
  25. Jeffrey Altman [Road Runner NYC] wrote:
  26. ...
  27. > Unless the user explicitly requests that the directory be treated as
  28. > relative to the current working directory at the time of file transfer
  29. > the specified path must be treated as referring to a fixed location.
  30. > We should not intentionally be adding features to Kermit which are going
  31. > to hurt people who do not happen to know every in and out of the program.
  32. > If deferred evaluation is a necessity, then it must be implemented 
  33. > either with a new command or a switch.  If you do not want to deal with
  34. > the difficulties of parsing a switch prior to the filename parse it 
  35. > afterwards.
  36. >  SET {SEND, RECEIVE} MOVE-TO <path> {/DEFERRED-EVALUATION} {/CREATE-DIR}
  37.  
  38. This was actually my original request (for a flag for deferred eval). I 
  39. agree that if this behavior is not what was expected in the past then it 
  40. needs to be explicitly requested.
  41.  
  42. Thanks,
  43.  
  44. Derek
  45.  
  46. -- 
  47. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  48. Derek Chen-Becker
  49. Senior Network Engineer
  50. CPI Corp, Inc.
  51. 1706 Washington Ave
  52. St. Louis, MO 63103
  53. Phone: 314-231-1575 x6014
  54. Fax:   314-613-6724
  55. dbecker@cpicorp.com
  56. PGP Key available from public key servers
  57. Fingerprint: 1C34 D81E D8A0 641D 6C8C  E952 3B15 693F 9184 BC58
  58. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  59.  
  60.